Socrates famously said that the unexamined life is not worth living. For over two millennia this statement has
provided thinkers a rationale for their queries. These words have inspired those wanting
to reflect upon their life and be deliberative in their actions. What most people don’t realize is that the Athenian
philosopher stole this line from the fifth-century orator, Perspicadius of
Corinth, and pulled it out of context. Historians
of ancient Greece had only recently discovered the Corinthian’s original words
buried in a Carolingian codex on the discarded shelf of a French monastery. Posterity is more familiar with Perspicadius’s
oft-cited line: “All Athenians are assholes.”
(Harsh for pious ears, a medieval scribe amended the phrase to “All Cretans are
Liars” and attributed it to Epimenides of Knossos.) Here are the words of Perspicadius: “The
unexamined life is not worth living, but it is even more worthwhile to live
your life without any thought at all.
Consider the beasts of the field.
Do they not live without introspection? Do they not care about their purpose or the
meaning to life and yet they seem to be content? Why should man be different?” As it turns out, historians think the randy Socrates
plagiarized the first statement in order to entice Athenian teens wanting to study
philosophy under the master. For the younger
boys, Socrates used candy. The historical damage has been done. Socrates lives on in the memories of future generations, while the deeper truths of Perspicadius
remain in obscurity.
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Unmensch
Most people who meet me don’t like what they
see. Some think I’m the mother of all
assholes, while others consider me no more than a loathsome spider they’d just
as soon stamp out if they could. What
they have in common is that they’re repulsed, quite visibly so, and I can’t
blame them. I mean, I’m okay on paper, but once people
interact with me face to face, they soon become bitterly disappointed. One woman after meeting me, I’m told,
contemplated suicide but somehow managed to pull herself out of this dark place
enough to live at least a life of emotional pain and solitude in her basement. Do you ever have moments when you wish you
could have lived your life differently?
Do you ever reflect in the quietness of your heart that the road to
happiness and enlightenment starts with little steps? Do you ever come to a kind of cosmic
realization that you could turn your life around? That a person’s worth is not measured by
others? That there's always a way out of the darkness if you just look for the light? Well, not me, but let me be
absolutely clear on one point: If you see me from afar, you won’t think much of
me, good or bad. If you hazard a
conversation or otherwise interact with me, however, you’ll walk away feeling convinced
that there is no God and all that you hold as sacred in this life amounts to a
pile of poo.
Monday, July 1, 2013
The Book of Job
I haven’t been feeling well these past few
days. Bearing these ills with patience and longsuffering, wretch that I am, is no easy task. I’m not looking for sympathy, just
an ear. Why has food become such an
enemy? I don’t deserve to be obese and
have type 2 diabetes. Anyway, I’ve run
out of insulin and the pharmacy won’t be open until Monday. My liquor cabinet has been empty for days and
I don’t have money to restock it because I basically torpedoed my family's financial security at the casino last Thursday. Worst
of all, my meth lab exploded yesterday and ruined the entire basement. Fortunately the wife and kids were out of
town at the time, as I had sent them to my parents' house with explicit instructions on how to play on their guilt for some cash. To add insult to
injury, the strip club down the street closed down. That was my only recreation in life. Really?
Am I really reduced to looking up call girls in my little black
book? Yes, unfortunately. It's not easy to endure this suffering with a quiet heart. I cry out to you, O Lord, but you do not
answer me. Oh well. At least I haven’t broken out in boils from
head to foot.
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Two Hearts on Canvas
A mysterious painting has drawn me here every
day. I gaze upon it and let my thoughts
wonder. The image on the canvas is
foreboding, but I don’t think I’m alone in experiencing the almost insufferable
sense of loneliness that it conveys.
This latter thought strangely comforts me.
I’ve been coming to this art gallery for nearly
a week now. At first I just sort of
wandered around aimlessly, initially more interested in the sculptures than the
engravings and paintings. Full
disclosure: I know very little about art, but I needed some kind of inspiration
and figured a visit to the gallery would get me out of my funk. Things haven’t been so great for me these
days. My life is in a state of flux and
I feel like I’m swimming in a sea of self-doubt. Last month I was essentially laid off from my
job of fourteen years, though I was the last person at work to know. I have other issues in my life right now that
I don’t care to share. Well, if you must
know, I’m estranged from my parents and even before the layoff I’d been
experiencing an “existential crisis,” if I can coin that outmoded phrase. So viewing art, and one painting in
particular, has been my only outlet and a diversion from my problems.
The artist managed to create two hearts in one crimson
brushstroke and set it against a wispy, swirling grey background. She called her work simply “A Brushstroke,”
probably to make it absolutely clear that she pulled this image off with one
remarkable move of the hand and wrist. The
artistry and simplicity of this canvas captured my imagination, admittedly not
at the first viewing. I kept coming back
to this painting, as it resonated with my memories and life experience.
Maybe something else brings me here almost every
day. As I stood gazing at this painting
on my second visit to the gallery, I became aware of a woman sitting on an
ottoman near the wall opposite the framed picture. She let me know with a polite clearing of her
throat that I had been obstructing her view.
I moved to the left and offered an apology with my body language. She had been writing or etching something
into a pad of paper, so I assumed she was an art student. Why was she so interested in this painting
too?
You might find it odd that we didn’t interact. I mean, why should we? We’re complete strangers. We exchanged courteous smiles as she got up to leave the gallery an hour later. I thought I saw deep solitude in her eyes, but I later surmised that I was looking at my reflection mirrored back to me. The next day, however, we spoke. She asked me what I thought of the painting. She said she’s getting a masters in art therapy and studying the effect that art can have on a person’s disposition. This painting, she conceded in perhaps an unguarded moment, had captivated her but she didn't know why. I told her I would tell her what I think over coffee at the diner. We stepped outside and walked across a rain-soaked street under an overcast sky.
You might find it odd that we didn’t interact. I mean, why should we? We’re complete strangers. We exchanged courteous smiles as she got up to leave the gallery an hour later. I thought I saw deep solitude in her eyes, but I later surmised that I was looking at my reflection mirrored back to me. The next day, however, we spoke. She asked me what I thought of the painting. She said she’s getting a masters in art therapy and studying the effect that art can have on a person’s disposition. This painting, she conceded in perhaps an unguarded moment, had captivated her but she didn't know why. I told her I would tell her what I think over coffee at the diner. We stepped outside and walked across a rain-soaked street under an overcast sky.
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Bodhisattva
As you can well imagine, I occasionally take the
“slings and arrows” of outrageous criticism for my views. If I’m doing my job on this blog, you won’t
find many partisan discussions of controversial issues that plague our bipolar
political culture; however, I’m not averse to making a stand on
certain issues that are important to me. Most of my readers understandably agree with
me, but there are a few contrarians out there.
The time has come to address my critics.
For instance, a colleague, in response to one of my blogs, asked me if I
think of myself as some kind of enlightened one who dismisses other viewpoints.
Well, as it turns out, I am an enlightened one. When I say enlightened,
I mean this in a literal and technical sense.
You see, when I wore a younger man’s shoes, I gave up everything, all my
possessions, including the shoes, and traveled to a remote Hindu monastery in the Himalayas to find
wisdom and solace in this life. I
studied under some of the great Hindu masters of the past two generations. I really don’t want to brag, but I would be remiss
not to mention my discipleship under Swami Chandrasekharan Aranya who guided me toward sannyasa via the Dashanami Sampradaya tradition. And I don’t mean to drop names here, but I studied
under Mageshkumar and Jagmohan Taranjit Balakrishnan. Anyway, I was able to renounce all material possessions and earthly desires. Through a strict regimen of rice and spiritual meditation, I emptied myself of the self, achieved a blissful state of detachment from the world, and reached the pinnacle of complete humility. I guess what I’m saying is that my views aren’t
so much opinions as they are oracles of wisdom, sagacious sayings that few
would dispute if they too were
enlightened (my italics).
Monday, June 24, 2013
Forgiving and Negotiating with Evil: Memoirs of the Rwandan Genocide (2/2)
This summer and fall I’ll have students read
Paul Rusesabagina’s autobiography for the Rwanda portion of my course. He hid Tutsis at the Hotel Mille Collines
where he served as hotel manager. His
heroism became the inspiration for the movie Hotel Rwanda. The insights I
gained from this book were pleasantly surprising. Rusesabagina’s survival and his protection of
over 1,200 people depended on his ability to negotiate. The power of words got him through this
difficult ordeal, though it didn’t hurt to have other negotiating “tools” at
his disposal, such as alcohol and money.
His earlier training as a pastor had helped sharpen his communication skills. Above all, Rusesabagina
possessed innate political savvy. He
knew how to size up a person and how far he could go in negotiation. He was a shrewd observer of poolside
politics. “Around this small square of
water is where the real business of the Mille Collines is conducted.” He learned how to use charm and work through
the unspoken patronage system that governs relationships and grants favors. This experience provided a valuable education
and came into use during the genocide.
Rwanda was a multilateral failure, and
Rusesabagina calls it like he sees it. The
UN was “worse than useless.” Indeed, any
credible book on the Rwandan genocide is essentially an indictment of UN
peacekeeping missions. The author doesn’t
even spare General Romeo Dallaire, the UN commander on the ground, who was one of
the few third-party officials trying to stop the killing and protect the innocents. He
didn’t do enough, writes Rusesabagina.
While he likes Dallaire on a personal level and acknowledges the
Canadian’s efforts, Rusesabagina thinks he should have disobeyed orders from
his UN higher-ups in New York and intervened in the conflict. “At the very least it would have forced the
UN to beef up its peacekeeping force and send us real fighters instead of inept
draftees from nations who seemed more interested in collecting their per diem
payments from the UN instead of doing anything meaningful.” Whether disobeying orders and engaging
militarily in the genocide would have helped I leave up to the reader.
Rusesabagina has less but equally harsh things to say
about France, “the policeman of Africa.”
The French government was so concerned about English-friendly Tutsi
taking over the country, that President Mitterand sent troops to the southern
part of Rwanda in order to protect Hutus; this “peacekeeping mission” gave
killers “the chance to look like victims instead of aggressors.” Rusesabagina weighs in on Uncle Sam’s role as
well. The U.S. could have jammed the
airwaves of RTLM, the talk radio program actively cheerleading the genocide. He recounts a phone exchange he had with a dismissive
and apathetic White House staffer. In
another passage Rusesabagina sourly comments that President Clinton, during his
mea culpa visit in 1998, never left the airport. Unlike Immaculeé, the hotel manager is more
critical of the United States and Paul Kagame, the current president, a Tutsi
leader who commanded the Rwandan Patriotic Front that ended the genocide. Whether these differences have to do with
their ethnic background—Rusesabagina is Hutu and Immaculeé is Tutsi—is an open
question.
What I most enjoyed about An Ordinary Man was the author’s shrewd assessment of human nature. His observations of Rwandan history taught him that “most politics is an outgrowth of emotions that may or may not have any relation to the rational.” Indeed, that’s how I see the rancorous division in the U.S., especially since the days of Clinton and Bush; the differences stem from visceral feelings and not from reasonable arguments. In another passage of the book Rusesabagina comes back to this idea: “People are never as reasonable as they seem to be—in fact, 'reason' is usually an afterthought, nothing more than a cover story for the feelings inside.” I’ve espoused the same viewpoint on this blog. Where we differ perhaps is on the nature of evil. In the concluding chapter Rusesabagina draws on C.S. Lewis to make the case that common decency is the norm in humanity; evil is an aberration. Finally, the author ends his book on a realistic note. He doesn’t give platitudes about a brighter future or give voice to the hopeful but vapid “Never again!” slogan. No. There will be genocides in the future. All we can do is find strength and take example from those who resisted evil or, in the case of the hotel manager of the Milles Collines, negotiated with it to save lives.
Rwanda was a multilateral failure, and
Rusesabagina calls it like he sees it. The
UN was “worse than useless.” Indeed, any
credible book on the Rwandan genocide is essentially an indictment of UN
peacekeeping missions. The author doesn’t
even spare General Romeo Dallaire, the UN commander on the ground, who was one of
the few third-party officials trying to stop the killing and protect the innocents. He
didn’t do enough, writes Rusesabagina.
While he likes Dallaire on a personal level and acknowledges the
Canadian’s efforts, Rusesabagina thinks he should have disobeyed orders from
his UN higher-ups in New York and intervened in the conflict. “At the very least it would have forced the
UN to beef up its peacekeeping force and send us real fighters instead of inept
draftees from nations who seemed more interested in collecting their per diem
payments from the UN instead of doing anything meaningful.” Whether disobeying orders and engaging
militarily in the genocide would have helped I leave up to the reader.
Rusesabagina has less but equally harsh things to say
about France, “the policeman of Africa.”
The French government was so concerned about English-friendly Tutsi
taking over the country, that President Mitterand sent troops to the southern
part of Rwanda in order to protect Hutus; this “peacekeeping mission” gave
killers “the chance to look like victims instead of aggressors.” Rusesabagina weighs in on Uncle Sam’s role as
well. The U.S. could have jammed the
airwaves of RTLM, the talk radio program actively cheerleading the genocide. He recounts a phone exchange he had with a dismissive
and apathetic White House staffer. In
another passage Rusesabagina sourly comments that President Clinton, during his
mea culpa visit in 1998, never left the airport. Unlike Immaculeé, the hotel manager is more
critical of the United States and Paul Kagame, the current president, a Tutsi
leader who commanded the Rwandan Patriotic Front that ended the genocide. Whether these differences have to do with
their ethnic background—Rusesabagina is Hutu and Immaculeé is Tutsi—is an open
question.What I most enjoyed about An Ordinary Man was the author’s shrewd assessment of human nature. His observations of Rwandan history taught him that “most politics is an outgrowth of emotions that may or may not have any relation to the rational.” Indeed, that’s how I see the rancorous division in the U.S., especially since the days of Clinton and Bush; the differences stem from visceral feelings and not from reasonable arguments. In another passage of the book Rusesabagina comes back to this idea: “People are never as reasonable as they seem to be—in fact, 'reason' is usually an afterthought, nothing more than a cover story for the feelings inside.” I’ve espoused the same viewpoint on this blog. Where we differ perhaps is on the nature of evil. In the concluding chapter Rusesabagina draws on C.S. Lewis to make the case that common decency is the norm in humanity; evil is an aberration. Finally, the author ends his book on a realistic note. He doesn’t give platitudes about a brighter future or give voice to the hopeful but vapid “Never again!” slogan. No. There will be genocides in the future. All we can do is find strength and take example from those who resisted evil or, in the case of the hotel manager of the Milles Collines, negotiated with it to save lives.
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Erika the Intern
I spent the late afternoon and evening with Erika in beautiful
Mundelein, a village north of Chicago, where she’ll be working as an intern for
a business that sells medical supplies. She
starts an eight-week internship tomorrow.
After checking into the hotel around 5:30, we explored this upscale town
to see what it has to offer and how far the business is from the hotel. I knew the town like the back of my hand
before we left; that is, I gave the region a good scrutiny on Google Maps. Mundelein and the adjacent Vernon Hills consist
of industrial parks and plenty of places to eat and shop. This place is definitely upscale and
expensive. We ate on the outdoor patio of a fine
Mexican restaurant and had “Guacamole Live” as an appetizer. A dude made it fresh on the spot! Exciting.
I guess that served as our entertainment for the evening. I went out on a limb and got three cheese enchiladas
with rice and beans. Erika did the same. We had a fun discussion about the
family. I find Erika to be so easy
going; she’s a pleasure to be around. I
think she’s a classic phlegmatic: an introvert and relationship-oriented
person. After the dinner we went to the
grocery store so Erika could stock up her hotel room kitchen for the next week
or so. She’s settling into her hotel
room and I’m currently in the lobby lounge area. I’m proud of Erika.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




